[Opensource] Migrating from 5.0 to 5.3

[Michael Rimov]

At 03:50 PM 10/10/2003, you wrote:
>Maybe I should clarify a point on my previous post... this seems to occur on
>MultiDBObjects, where I use something like:
>
>myMulti.setDBName(myDBObj.getDataContext()), where myDBObj is one of the
>DBObjects used in the MultiDBObject.  Maybe I need to explicitly set the
>context in these cases (at least until I can convert these to
>JoinedDataObjects).

Malc... of course, my preference is setDataContext() explicitly, but I 
suspect a bug since I was just trying to get this resolved for Francesco on 
standard DBObjects.  I don't suppose you would kinda wanta sorta couldya do 
some debugging on the internal data context and figure out why at least 
"Default" isn't getting returned in your instance?  I don't have any 
MultiDBObject test cases readily available and the base unit tests pass.

I also look forward to hearing feedback on your work with JoinedDataObject 
and what we can do with it.  We have one vote for being able to pass a DOM 
or at least the configuration bean, into the initialization so that you can 
define joins on the fly.

Thanks!
                                                 -Mike