[Opensource] AutoDBObject
Michael Rimov
rimovm at centercomp.com
Mon Jul 29 19:50:47 PDT 2002
Salvador & Aime,
Yes that is definitely a significant bug in AutoDBObject and my making
DBObject.getDef() final isn't helping either. If someone can make a
proposed fix, I'll gladly test and include it. Otherwise, I'll have to
put it on the bug list for inclusion in either a 4.11 or 4.2 release due to
time limitations.
Thank you for summarizing the problem so well!
-Mike
>Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2002 23:40:00
>To: opensource at jcorporate.com
>Subject: RE: [Opensource] AutoDBObject
>From: "Salvador Cadena" <salvador.cadena at isol.com.mx>
>Hi,
>I went over all the code, and found the same thing,
>Since the DBObject uses the class name to register
>The definition of any new DBObject, and this information
>Is static for the class, once the getDef() method receives
>The class name (AutoDBObject)It saves the structure in the
>Field pointing to DBObjectDef class. It seems you can only have
>One AutoDBObject per session.
>I haven't tried this, but maybe if you create one DBObject that
>extends the AutoDBObject class, you could have different class names
>For each AutoDBObject, so, you will have one definition for
>Each one. After all, you still will saving the SetupField method
>For each DBObject, since the method SetTargetTable do it for you.
>I hope this helps.
>Good Luck!
>Salvador Cadena
>salvador.cadena at isol.com.mx
>Tels. (52) 55 5523 3962
> (52) 55 5523 6992
>Mobil 044 55 85804207
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: opensource-admin at jcorporate.com
>[mailto:opensource-admin at jcorporate.com] On Behalf Of BSC
>Sent: Sábado, 27 de Julio de 2002 09:53 p.m.
>To: opensource at jcorporate.com
>Subject: [Opensource] AutoDBObject
>
>Is anyone using AutoDBObject? I am running 4.02 and when I call DBMaint
>with AutoDBObject it doesn't work the 2nd time around (when a different
>table is requested the 2nd time with the &table parameter). It looks
>like the DBObjectDef is set on the 1st request but then not reset to
>reflect the meta data of the table in the 2nd request. This would be
>fine for any other DBObject but not AutoDBObject?? Anyone run into
>this? Am I missing something here? Here's the url I used:
>http://localhost/DBMaint.do?dbobj=com.jcorporate.expresso.core.dbobj.Aut
>oDBObject&table=event_dates&state=List
>Thanks,
>---
>Aime
>
>
>
>
>
>_____________________________________________________
>Supercharge your e-mail with a 25MB Inbox, POP3 Access, No Ads and
>NoTaglines --> LYCOS MAIL PLUS.
>http://www.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus
>_______________________________________________
>Opensource mailing list
>Opensource at jcorporate.com
>http://mail.jcorporate.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource
>Archives: http://mail.jcorporate.com/pipermail/opensource/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Opensource mailing list
>Opensource at jcorporate.com
>http://mail.jcorporate.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource
>Archives: http://mail.jcorporate.com/pipermail/opensource/
More information about the Opensource
mailing list